Contrasting anywhere between latest relationship form of towards the sexual satisfaction was basically tested having fun with an excellent MANOVA

Contrasting anywhere between latest relationship form of towards the sexual satisfaction was basically tested having fun with an excellent MANOVA

Desk 10:Form and you will Basic Deviations of Polyamorous Try Centered on Newest Matchmaking Type of and Comfort level with Disclosure so you’re able to Psychological state Masters.

As well as be seen within the Dining table eleven, pairwise contrasting found that polyamorous individuals currently within the non-the time nonmonogamous relationship advertised straight down total relationships pleasure (since the measured by GMREL overall level score) than polyamorous some body into the monogamous relationship (p=0.00), hierarchical low-monogamous matchmaking (p=0.00), nonhierarchical non-monogamous dating (p=0.00), moving matchmaking (p=0.00), triad matchmaking (p=0.00), polyfidelity dating (p=0.00), polyfamily relationship (p=0.00), tribe/ pod matchmaking (p=0.00), “other” relationship (p=0.00), and polyamorous people who reported that they certainly were “undecided” regarding their most recent relationships types of (p=0.00).

Difference in latest matchmaking particular and sexual satisfaction since the counted from the the latest GMSEX

47; F(eleven,6018)=, p=0.00). Follow-right up univariate ANOVAs discovered that there is a big change ranging from latest relationships type of into the all proportions of new GMSEX: Measurement 1 (F(11,993)=, p=0.00), Dimensions dos (F(eleven,993)=, p=0.00), Aspect 3 (F(11,993)=, p=0.00), Aspect cuatro (F(eleven,993)=, p=0.00), Aspect 5 (F(11,993)=, p=0.00), together with full size score, full relationship satisfaction (F(eleven,993)=, p=0.00). To identify and that relationships versions differed of which almost every other dating brands, pairwise comparisons was indeed presented (Tukey HSD).

As can get noticed in the Table several, pairwise comparisons unearthed that polyamorous someone currently within the non-the full time nonmonogamous matchmaking stated that the latest datingranking.net/tr/yubo-inceleme/ sexual relationship were less satisfying (since the measured by Dimensions 1 on GMSEX) than polyamorous anybody into the monogamous (p=0.00), hierarchical low-monogamous (p=0.00), non-hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.00), swinging (p=0.00), triad (p=0.00), polyfidelity (p=0.00), and polyfamily matchmaking (p=0.00). Pairwise contrasting unearthed that polyamorous somebody currently within the monogamous matchmaking said the latest matchmaking had been less rewarding (once the measured of the Dimensions 1 to the GMSEX) than just polyamorous someone for the swinging (p=0.05) and polyfamily matchmaking(p=0.04). Pairwise evaluations found that polyamorous anybody currently during the “other” known relationships reported their intimate dating was indeed quicker rewarding (while the counted from the Dimensions 1 into the GMSEX) than just polyamorous someone into the low-hierarchical low-monogamous (p=0.03), moving (p=0.01), and you will polyfamily relationship (p=0.01). On the other hand, pairwise contrasting discovered that polyamorous individuals who recognized as “undecided” regarding their current relationships sorts of stated that their intimate relationships was indeed shorter fulfilling (because mentioned by the Measurement 1 to the GMSEX) than simply polyamorous some body inside swinging matchmaking (p=0.05).

As can be seen into the Table thirteen, pairwise contrasting found that polyamorous anyone in low-the amount of time low-monogamous matchmaking reported that their most recent intimate matchmaking was less fulfilling (just like the measured from the Dimensions 2 on the GMSEX) than simply polyamorous anybody during the monogamous (p=0.00), hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.00), non-hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.00), swinging (p=0.00), triad (p=0.00), polyfidelity (p=0.00), and polyfamily relationships (p=0.00). Pairwise comparisons unearthed that polyamorous individuals already into the monogamous relationship stated their intimate matchmaking have been smaller rewarding (since the measured of the Dimension 2 into the GMSEX) than polyamorous anyone into the non-hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.04) and you may polyfamily relationships (p=0.03). On the other hand, pairwise reviews discovered that polyamorous people who identified as “undecided” inside their current relationship type stated that the intimate relationships have been quicker satisfying (because the measured because of the Dimensions dos on the GMSEX) than just polyamorous anybody inside swinging (p=0.05) and you may polyfamily dating (p=0.02).

Multivariate screening have been presented and found there is a life threatening difference between latest relationship designs towards the an excellent linear combination of proportions out of sexual joy and you can overall sexual joy while the mentioned by GMSEX (Wilks’ Lambda=0

As well as get noticed from inside the Table 14, pairwise reviews learned that polyamorous some one when you look at the low-committed non-monogamous matchmaking stated that the most recent sexual matchmaking was in fact smaller rewarding (just like the measured because of the Measurement step 3 to the GMSEX) than simply polyamorous someone from inside the monogamous (p=0.00), hierarchical low-monogamous (p=0.00), non-hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.00), swinging (p=0.00), triad (p=0.00), polyfidelity (p=0.00), and polyfamily matchmaking (p=0.00). Pairwise contrasting learned that polyamorous some body during the monogamous dating stated that their newest sexual relationships have been smaller fulfilling (because the mentioned by the Dimension step three into GMSEX) than polyamorous some body from inside the polyfamily relationships (p=0.02). While doing so, pairwise comparisons learned that polyamorous someone into the polyfamily dating reported that their newest intimate dating was in fact as pleasing (since measured from the Dimensions step 3 on the GMSEX) than just polyamorous anybody inside “other” dating (p=0.02) and you can polyamorous individuals who identified as “undecided” within newest relationships variety of (p=0.01).

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *